33 U.S.C. § 933 – Third-Party Remedies (LHWCA)

Table of Contents

Code Details

30 USC 933: Duties of operators in States not qualifying under workmen’s compensation laws
Text contains those laws in effect on August 26, 2025
From Title 30-MINERAL LANDS AND MINING
CHAPTER 22-MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
SUBCHAPTER IV-BLACK LUNG BENEFITS
Part C-Claims for Benefits After December 31, 1973

Exact Statute Text

Click to view the complete statute text
§933. Duties of operators in States not qualifying under workmen’s compensation laws
(a) Securing of benefits for miners; self-insurers; mutual companies
During any period in which a State workmen’s compensation law is not included on the list published by the Secretary under section 931(b) of this title each operator of a coal mine in such State shall secure the payment of benefits for which he is liable under section 932 of this title by (1) qualifying as a self-insurer in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary, or (2) insuring and keeping insured the payment of such benefits with any stock company or mutual company or association, or with any other person or fund, including any State fund, while such company, association, person or fund is authorized under the laws of any State to insure workmen’s compensation.(b) Required provisions of insurance contracts
In order to meet the requirements of clause (2) of subsection (a) of this section, every policy or contract of insurance must contain-(1) a provision to pay benefits required under section 932 of this title, notwithstanding the provisions of the State workmen’s compensation law which may provide for lesser payments;

(2) a provision that insolvency or bankruptcy of the operator or discharge therein (or both) shall not relieve the carrier from liability for such payments; and

(3) such other provisions as the Secretary, by regulation, may require.

(c) Cancellation of insurance contracts
No policy or contract of insurance issued by a carrier to comply with the requirements of clause (2) of subsection (a) of this subsection 1 shall be canceled prior to the date specified in such policy or contract for its expiration until at least thirty days have elapsed after notice of cancellation has been sent by registered or certified mail to the Secretary and to the operator at his last known place of business.

(d) Penalties for failure to secure payment of benefits
(1) Any employer required to secure the payment of benefits under this section who fails to secure such benefits shall be subject to a civil penalty assessed by the Secretary of not more than

Exact Statute Text

,000 for each day during which such failure occurs. In any case where such employer is a corporation, the president, secretary, and treasurer thereof also shall be severally liable to such civil penalty as provided in this subsection for the failure of such corporation to secure the payment of benefits. Such president, secretary, and treasurer shall be severally personally liable, jointly with such corporation, for any benefit which may accrue under this subchapter in respect to any disability which may occur to any employee of such corporation while it shall so fail to secure the payment of benefits as required by this section.

(2) Any employer of a miner who knowingly transfers, sells, encumbers, assigns, or in any manner disposes of, conceals, secrets,2 or destroys any property belonging to such employer, after any miner employed by such employer has filed a claim under this subchapter, and with intent to avoid the payment of benefits under this subchapter to such miner or his or her dependents, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than

Exact Statute Text

,000, or by imprisonment for not more than one year, or both. In any case where such employer is a corporation, the president, secretary, and treasurer thereof also shall be severally liable for such penalty of imprisonment as well as jointly liable with such corporation for such fine.

(3) This subsection shall not affect any other liability of the employer under this part.

33 U.S.C. § 933 Summary

Please note: While the title of this article refers to “33 U.S.C. § 933 – Third-Party Remedies (LHWCA)”, the provided “Code Details” and “Exact Statute Text” specifically detail 30 U.S.C. § 933. This section of Title 30 pertains to the duties of coal mine operators regarding Black Lung benefits in states whose workmen’s compensation laws do not meet federal standards. This summary and subsequent sections will analyze 30 U.S.C. § 933 based on the provided text.

This statute, 30 U.S.C. § 933, mandates that coal mine operators in states whose workers’ compensation laws are deemed inadequate by the Secretary of Labor must secure the payment of Black Lung benefits for which they are liable under 30 U.S.C. § 932. Operators have two primary ways to fulfill this obligation: either by qualifying as a self-insurer through federal regulations or by purchasing and maintaining insurance from an authorized company. The law also specifies strict requirements for these insurance policies, ensuring they cover federal benefit levels regardless of state law, and that operator insolvency does not relieve the insurer of liability. Furthermore, the statute details cancellation procedures for insurance policies and imposes significant civil and criminal penalties on operators and their corporate officers who fail to secure these benefits or attempt to evade payments by disposing of assets.

Purpose of 33 U.S.C. § 933

The legislative purpose behind 30 U.S.C. § 933 is to establish a robust and enforceable system for ensuring that coal miners suffering from Black Lung disease, and their dependents, receive the federal benefits they are entitled to. This section of the Black Lung Benefits Act addresses a critical problem: the potential for miners to be left without financial support due to inadequate state workmen’s compensation laws or financially unstable employers. By mandating that operators secure these benefits through self-insurance or specific types of insurance, the law aims to create a safety net, protecting vulnerable miners. It serves as a deterrent against non-compliance, ensuring accountability for coal mine operators and their corporate leadership. This statute directly supports the broader goal of compensating workers for occupational illnesses, particularly in hazardous industries like coal mining, where the risks are well-documented.

Real-World Example of 33 U.S.C. § 933

Consider a scenario in “Coalville,” a hypothetical state where the state’s workmen’s compensation laws for occupational diseases, specifically Black Lung, are not on the Secretary’s approved list under 30 U.S.C. § 931(b). “Deep Earth Mining Co.” operates a coal mine in Coalville.

Under 30 U.S.C. § 933(a), Deep Earth Mining Co. is required to secure federal Black Lung benefits for its miners. It chooses to do so by purchasing an insurance policy from “MinerCare Insurance Corp.” This policy, as per § 933(b), must explicitly state that it will pay benefits required by 30 U.S.C. § 932, even if Coalville’s state law specifies lower amounts, and it must confirm that Deep Earth Mining Co.’s potential bankruptcy won’t negate MinerCare’s liability.

One of Deep Earth’s long-time miners, John Smith, is diagnosed with Black Lung disease and files a claim for federal benefits. Subsequently, Deep Earth Mining Co. experiences financial difficulties and ceases operations without paying benefits to John or other affected miners. If Deep Earth had *failed* to secure insurance or qualify as a self-insurer as mandated by § 933, the company would face a daily civil penalty of up to $1,000, and its president, secretary, and treasurer would be personally liable for these penalties and any unpaid benefits to John Smith and other miners under § 933(d)(1). Furthermore, if Deep Earth’s president, knowing John had a claim, tried to sell off company assets to avoid paying John’s benefits, they could face criminal charges, including fines and imprisonment, under § 933(d)(2). This statute ensures that even in states with inadequate compensation systems, miners like John have a federally mandated pathway to secure their due benefits.

Several statutes are directly related to 30 U.S.C. § 933, providing context and defining the obligations and benefits referenced:

  • 30 U.S.C. § 931(b) – List of States: This section is explicitly referenced in 30 U.S.C. § 933(a). It directs the Secretary of Labor to publish a list of states whose workmen’s compensation laws provide adequate coverage for pneumoconiosis (Black Lung disease) and meet federal standards. If a state is not on this list, then the duties outlined in 30 U.S.C. § 933 become active for coal mine operators within that state.
  • 30 U.S.C. § 932 – Benefits for Which Operators Are Liable: This statute is central to 30 U.S.C. § 933, as it defines the specific Black Lung benefits that operators are legally obligated to provide. Section 933 ensures that the payment of *these* benefits is secured. The required provisions in insurance contracts under § 933(b)(1) specifically refer to ensuring benefits at the level mandated by § 932.
  • Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.): While broader, this foundational act governs mine safety and health standards. The Black Lung Benefits Act, of which 30 U.S.C. § 933 is a part, exists within this larger framework, aiming to protect miners not just through prevention but also through compensation for occupational diseases.

Case Law Interpreting 33 U.S.C. § 933

Regarding the provided text for 30 U.S.C. § 933, a notable case interpreting aspects of operator liability under the Black Lung Benefits Act, including the securing of benefits, is:

  • Consolidation Coal Company v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs – This and similar cases often delve into the specific requirements for operators to secure benefits, the nature of their liability, and the interplay between federal and state compensation schemes. While this specific case might cover broader aspects of Black Lung claims, it is representative of the kind of litigation that arises from the duties imposed by sections like 30 U.S.C. § 933, particularly concerning how operators are identified as responsible parties and whether they have met their obligations for securing benefits.

Why 33 U.S.C. § 933 Matters in Personal Injury Litigation

While the article’s H2 refers to “33 U.S.C. § 933”, the provided statute text (30 U.S.C. § 933) is highly relevant in personal injury litigation concerning occupational diseases, specifically Black Lung. This statute is crucial because it directly addresses the financial security of benefits for miners afflicted with this debilitating illness, profoundly impacting both plaintiff strategy and defense arguments.

For plaintiffs—miners and their families seeking Black Lung benefits—understanding this statute is paramount. It clarifies the specific obligations of coal mine operators to secure payment, providing a clear legal basis for claims. If an operator has failed to comply with 30 U.S.C. § 933, it strengthens the miner’s case, potentially allowing them to pursue claims not only against the operator but also against its corporate officers personally, as detailed in subsection (d). This can be a critical avenue for recovery if the corporate entity itself is insolvent or attempts to evade liability. Attorneys representing miners must investigate the operator’s compliance with these insurance or self-insurance requirements, as non-compliance can lead to severe penalties for the employer and additional leverage for the claimant.

For defense arguments, operators must demonstrate strict adherence to 30 U.S.C. § 933. Proof of proper self-insurance qualification or a valid, compliant insurance policy is essential to avoid penalties and to demonstrate good faith in meeting federal obligations. The statute’s detailed requirements for insurance contracts (e.g., covering federal benefit levels, protection against insolvency) mean that an operator’s defense hinges on the thoroughness and legality of their benefit-securing arrangements. Furthermore, the severe penalties for knowingly disposing of assets to avoid payment underscore the high stakes for employers and their executives, making robust compliance programs a necessity.

In essence, this statute establishes a non-negotiable floor for operator responsibility, providing a vital tool for securing benefits for victims of an occupational disease and holding employers accountable in the challenging landscape of federal Black Lung compensation.

Scroll to Top