Labor Code § 451.001 – Retaliation for Filing Workers’ Compensation Claims Prohibited

Table of Contents

Code Details

LABOR CODE

TITLE 5. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

SUBTITLE B. DISCRIMINATION ISSUES

CHAPTER 451. DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED

Exact Statute Text

Click to view the complete statute text

DISCRIMINATION AGAINST EMPLOYEES PROHIBITED. A person may not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against an employee because the employee has:

(1) filed a workers’ compensation claim in good faith;

(2) hired a lawyer to represent the employee in a claim;

(3) instituted or caused to be instituted in good faith a proceeding under Subtitle A; or

(4) testified or is about to testify in a proceeding under Subtitle A.

Labor Code § 451.001 Summary

This Texas Labor Code section makes it unlawful for an employer, or any other “person,” to fire or otherwise discriminate against an employee for exercising their rights under the Texas workers’ compensation system. Specifically, an employer cannot take adverse action against an employee for:

  • Filing a workers’ compensation claim, provided it’s done in good faith.
  • Retaining a lawyer to assist with a workers’ compensation claim.
  • Initiating or causing to be initiated a workers’ compensation proceeding in good faith.
  • Providing testimony or preparing to testify in a workers’ compensation proceeding.

In essence, this statute protects employees from job loss or other forms of workplace discrimination simply because they have sought, or are seeking, the benefits and protections afforded by Texas workers’ compensation laws. It ensures that employees can pursue their legal rights without fear of negative consequences from their employer.

Purpose of Labor Code § 451.001

The legislative intent behind this section of the Labor Code is to safeguard Texas employees from employer retaliation when they seek benefits or participate in the workers’ compensation process. Without such protection, employees injured on the job might be hesitant to file a workers’ compensation claim due to fear of losing their employment, being demoted, or facing other adverse actions.

This statute serves several critical purposes:

  • Employee Protection: It offers a crucial layer of job security for injured workers, allowing them to pursue their legal rights without fear of reprisal. This fosters a workplace environment where employees feel empowered to report injuries and seek necessary medical care and financial support.
  • Integrity of the Workers’ Compensation System: By prohibiting discrimination, the statute helps ensure the workers’ compensation system operates as intended, providing benefits to those legitimately injured on the job. It prevents employers from circumventing their obligations by intimidating or punishing claimants.
  • Deterrence of Employer Misconduct: It acts as a deterrent, discouraging employers from engaging in illegal discriminatory practices against their injured employees. Employers are held accountable for their actions, promoting fair treatment in the aftermath of a workplace accident.

For anyone navigating a work injury claim in Texas, understanding this protection is key to asserting their rights confidently and preventing wrongful termination or other forms of workplace discrimination.

Real-World Example of Labor Code § 451.001

Imagine Sarah, a dedicated warehouse worker, suffers a severe back injury while lifting heavy boxes at her job. She immediately reports the injury to her supervisor and files a workers’ compensation claim to cover her medical expenses and lost wages during recovery. Her claim is filed in good faith, as the injury occurred legitimately during her work duties.

Shortly after Sarah files her claim, her employer, “MegaCorp,” begins to treat her differently. Despite her doctor clearing her for light duty, MegaCorp suddenly assigns her undesirable tasks outside her usual role, isolates her from her team, and makes snide remarks about “costly injuries.” A few weeks later, MegaCorp terminates Sarah’s employment, citing “restructuring” as the reason, even though no other employees in her department were let go.

In this scenario, Labor Code § 451.001 would be highly relevant. Sarah could argue that MegaCorp violated the statute by discharging and discriminating against her because she filed a workers’ compensation claim in good faith. Her termination appears to be directly retaliatory, intended to punish her for seeking benefits she was legally entitled to. Sarah would likely have a strong claim for wrongful termination and discrimination under this statute, seeking damages beyond her workers’ compensation benefits, such as lost wages, mental anguish, and potentially punitive damages.

While Labor Code § 451.001 specifically addresses retaliation for workers’ compensation claims, it operates within a broader legal framework. The most directly related statutory reference is found within its own text:

  • Subtitle A of Title 5 of the Labor Code (The Texas Workers’ Compensation Act): This comprehensive subtitle outlines the entire Texas workers’ compensation system, including eligibility for benefits, claim procedures, employer responsibilities, and dispute resolution. Labor Code § 451.001 exists to protect employees who engage in activities defined or enabled by Subtitle A, such as filing claims, instituting proceedings, or testifying. It ensures the protections offered by the Workers’ Compensation Act can be fully utilized without fear of negative repercussions.

Other statutes that might intersect or be considered in a broader context, though not directly mentioned in § 451.001 itself, include:

  • Texas Labor Code, Chapter 21 (Texas Commission on Human Rights Act): This chapter prohibits discrimination based on race, color, disability, religion, sex, national origin, or age. While workers’ compensation retaliation is distinct, claims often arise in the context of broader employment discrimination issues, especially if an injured worker also has a disability.
  • Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Chapter 16, Section 16.003 (Statute of Limitations): This section dictates the general two-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions, which would typically apply to claims brought under Labor Code § 451.001.

Case Law Interpreting Labor Code § 451.001

Several important court decisions have helped to shape the interpretation and application of Labor Code § 451.001. A pivotal case in understanding the burden of proof for plaintiffs is:

In *Contreras v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.*, the Texas Supreme Court clarified the causation standard required for a workers’ compensation retaliation claim. The Court held that an employee must establish a “but for” causal connection between the filing of the workers’ compensation claim and the adverse employment action. This means the employee must show that “but for” the filing of the claim, the retaliatory act would not have occurred. While direct evidence of a retaliatory motive is strong, the Court affirmed that circumstantial evidence can also be sufficient to prove causation. Such circumstantial evidence might include: knowledge of the claim by those making the adverse employment decision, a temporal proximity between the claim and the adverse action, or expressions of a negative attitude toward the employee’s injured status. This ruling has been instrumental in guiding both plaintiffs and defendants in litigating these types of claims.

Why Labor Code § 451.001 Matters in Personal Injury Litigation

Labor Code § 451.001 is a critically important statute for injured Texas workers and their legal representation in personal injury litigation. While a personal injury claim typically focuses on securing compensation for injuries caused by negligence, this specific statute addresses a distinct and equally damaging wrong: employer retaliation.

Here’s why it matters:

  • Expanded Cause of Action: For an employee who suffers a work-related injury, this law provides an additional, powerful cause of action beyond just the workers’ compensation claim itself. If an employer fires or discriminates against an employee for filing a claim, the employee can pursue a separate lawsuit under § 451.001, seeking damages that workers’ compensation typically doesn’t cover.
  • Significant Damages Potential: Unlike workers’ compensation, which provides specific benefits (medical care, lost wages at a set rate), a successful retaliation claim under § 451.001 can result in a much broader range of damages. These can include past and future lost wages and benefits, mental anguish, exemplary (punitive) damages to punish the employer, and attorney’s fees. This significantly raises the stakes for employers who engage in unlawful conduct.
  • Protection for Injured Workers: This statute empowers injured workers to assert their rights without fear of job loss. It acts as a shield, allowing them to focus on recovery and obtaining necessary benefits, rather than worrying about their livelihood.
  • Deterrent to Employer Misconduct: Knowing that such a claim can lead to substantial financial penalties encourages employers to adhere to the law and treat injured employees fairly. It holds employers accountable and promotes ethical workplace practices.
  • Strategic Tool for Attorneys: For personal injury attorneys representing injured workers, this statute is a vital tool. It allows them to protect their clients from immediate and future financial hardship caused by an employer’s illegal actions. It also provides leverage in negotiations and can lead to more comprehensive settlements for victims of workplace injury and retaliation.

In essence, Labor Code § 451.001 ensures that the path to recovery for an injured worker is not obstructed by unlawful employer behavior, reinforcing the principle of fairness and justice in Texas workplaces.

Scroll to Top