Labor Code § 61.016 – Wage Payment Form (Method and Form of Wage Payments)

Table of Contents

Code Details

LABOR CODE

TITLE 2. PROTECTION OF LABORERS

SUBTITLE C. WAGES

CHAPTER 61. PAYMENT OF WAGES

Exact Statute Text

Click to view the complete statute text
FORM OF PAYMENT. (a) An employer shall pay wages to an employee:

(1) in United States currency;

(2) by a written instrument issued by the employer that is negotiable on demand at full face value for United States currency; or

(3) by the electronic transfer of funds to:

(A) a financial institution account designated by the employee; or

(B) a payroll card account established by the employer.

(b) An employee may agree in writing to receive part or all of the wages in kind or in another form.

(c) Payment by a written instrument that is not negotiable or for which payment is refused for any reason attributable to the employer does not constitute payment of wages for the purposes of this chapter.

Labor Code § 61.016 Summary

This section of the Texas Labor Code outlines the permissible methods by which employers must pay wages to their employees. It mandates that employers pay wages using United States currency, a written instrument (like a check) that is negotiable on demand for its full face value, or through electronic transfer to either an employee’s designated bank account or a payroll card account set up by the employer. The statute also includes a provision allowing employees to agree in writing to receive a portion or all of their wages in non-cash forms, such as goods or services. Importantly, the statute specifies that if an employer issues a written instrument that cannot be readily cashed or if payment on that instrument is refused due to the employer’s fault, it does not count as a valid wage payment under Chapter 61.

Purpose of Labor Code § 61.016

The legislative intent behind this particular Texas Labor Code section is to establish clear and reliable standards for wage payment, primarily safeguarding employees from exploitative or inconvenient payment practices. The purpose of this law is to ensure that workers receive their earned income in a form that is immediately accessible, liquid, and universally accepted. By stipulating specific methods like US currency, negotiable instruments, or direct electronic transfers, the statute prevents employers from paying wages in forms that are difficult to convert to cash, such as non-negotiable scrip, vouchers, or goods without a prior written agreement. This promotes economic stability for employees, reduces the potential for wage disputes regarding the method of payment, and helps to standardize payroll practices across the state, ultimately protecting laborers’ rights to their full and usable wages.

Real-World Example of Labor Code § 61.016

Consider an employee named David who works for a construction company, “Lone Star Builders.”

  • Compliant Payment (Standard): Lone Star Builders ensures David’s weekly paycheck is deposited directly into his personal bank account via electronic transfer, which he designated when he started employment. This method adheres to Section 61.016(a)(3)(A). Alternatively, they could give him a standard check drawn on their company bank account, easily cashed at his bank, fulfilling Section 61.016(a)(2).
  • Compliant Payment (Agreement): David, a highly skilled carpenter, discusses with Lone Star Builders that he needs a specific, expensive set of power tools. They agree in writing that a portion of his next month’s wages will be fulfilled by providing him with these tools, with the remainder paid via direct deposit. This arrangement falls under Section 61.016(b), where an employee agrees in writing to receive wages in kind.
  • Non-Compliant Payment: One month, Lone Star Builders is experiencing cash flow problems. Instead of a direct deposit or a regular check, they give David a “promissory note” that states they will pay him in 60 days, or a check that bounces due to insufficient funds in the company’s account. Under Section 61.016(c), neither of these constitutes a valid payment of wages. The promissory note is not “negotiable on demand at full face value,” and the bounced check’s refusal of payment is “attributable to the employer.” In this scenario, David still has a valid claim for his unpaid wages, as the employer failed to meet the statutory requirements for wage payment form.

Several other sections within Texas Labor Code Chapter 61 complement or provide context to the requirements for wage payment forms:

  • Labor Code § 61.011 (Definitions): This section provides critical definitions for terms like “employer,” “employee,” and “wages” used throughout Chapter 61, including § 61.016. Understanding these foundational definitions is essential for applying the wage payment rules correctly.
  • Labor Code § 61.014 (Payment of Wages): This statute outlines the general requirement that employers must pay wages at least twice a month on specific, regular paydays. While § 61.014 dictates *when* wages must be paid, § 61.016 specifies *how* those payments must be made.
  • Labor Code § 61.017 (Deductions from Wages): This section addresses the conditions under which an employer may make deductions from an employee’s wages. Although not directly about the form of payment, it pertains to the calculation of the net wage that is ultimately paid according to the methods outlined in § 61.016.
  • Labor Code § 61.018 (Wages Payable on Discharge or Resignation): This statute specifies the timing for paying final wages when an employee is discharged or resigns. Similar to § 61.014, it addresses *when* payment is due, with § 61.016 still governing the acceptable *form* of that final payment.

Case Law Interpreting Labor Code § 61.016

Specific case law directly interpreting the nuances of Labor Code § 61.016 regarding the exact “form of payment” (e.g., what constitutes a “negotiable instrument” or the specifics of a “payroll card account”) is not widely published or extensively litigated compared to other aspects of wage disputes, such as the amount or timing of wages. Disputes under Chapter 61 frequently center on whether wages were paid at all, the correct amount owed, or the timeliness of payment, rather than the specific method of payment itself, especially when employers generally adhere to common practices like direct deposit or checks. Therefore, specific, commonly cited cases with detailed interpretations of subsections (a), (b), or (c) of Labor Code § 61.016 are not readily available in general legal databases for direct interpretation of the *form* of payment.

Why Labor Code § 61.016 Matters in Personal Injury Litigation

While Labor Code § 61.016 primarily addresses wage payment methods, its implications can indirectly touch upon personal injury litigation, particularly concerning the calculation and proof of damages.

  • Proving Lost Wages and Earning Capacity: In a personal injury case, a plaintiff often seeks compensation for lost wages, past and future, and diminished earning capacity resulting from their injuries. To substantiate these claims, robust documentation of pre-injury income is crucial. Labor Code § 61.016 mandates that wages be paid through verifiable methods—such as checks, direct deposits, or payroll cards—which inherently create a clear paper trail or electronic record. If an employer fails to comply with this statute by paying in unrecorded cash or non-negotiable instruments, proving the plaintiff’s actual income before the injury becomes significantly more challenging for their attorney. Conversely, compliance with § 61.016 ensures that employers generate records that can effectively support a plaintiff’s claim for lost income.
  • Credibility of Financial Records: If an employer’s payment practices are so irregular or non-compliant with § 61.016 that reliable wage records are absent, it can complicate the financial aspects of a personal injury claim. This lack of clear documentation might necessitate more extensive and costly forensic accounting or alternative methods to establish the plaintiff’s earnings, potentially affecting the efficiency and outcome of the case.
  • Holistic Client Financial Picture: While not a direct cause of action in a personal injury claim, understanding a client’s employment and wage history, including how they were paid, is part of building a comprehensive picture of their financial losses. Attorneys representing injured clients need to assess all potential avenues for compensation, and the clarity and legality of wage payments under this statute can play a role in that assessment.

Therefore, while not a direct personal injury statute, Labor Code § 61.016 underpins the reliability of income documentation, which is a vital component for accurately quantifying damages in many personal injury claims.

Scroll to Top